Understand Law and Governance at: capillarywave.com
The Never Settle Podcast:
My first run in with the council enforcement department came when I decided to erect a standard B&Q type wooden fence, in a field in the middle of the Somerset countryside. This type of fence is commonly erected around household gardens, there is nothing obscure or peculiar about them, but for some reason the council objected to my erecting some at my field. This was the beginning of my problems with the council.
Despite the bad start, since then I have built an office/flat, 80 x 25ft Workshop, garage, various barns (stone and steel framed), kennels and am building a house, and more; without legal planning permission.
I Have built what most would call a “smallholding”.
As mentioned briefly before I started to build, the council had a problem with me putting up a wooden fence and changing a five bar farm gate. As you will see as this battle got bigger and bigger the council eventually drafted in a planning expert from Wales for their case against me.
The eventual outcome after a five year battle, is that now they do not want to take me to court. They have said this to me in a recorded meeting, in front of witnesses.
Why is that? That is what we will find out today on Mel’s -Never Settle Podcast.
In the beginning:
I have some land on the outskirts of a country village that I was using as a storage yard for my construction business. The land was a grass field with a wooden stable block in it, a shipping container for tools, and a standard farm five bar gate, originally.
I used to keep my Ifor Williams trailers there and a work van and a few packs of bricks and blocks etc.
After some thieves broke to the shipping container, one morning me and a friend put up some B&Q wooden garden fencing inside the land, on my side of the hedge (that is adjacent the road) to block the view in winter when the hedges were bare. That same afternoon I had a visit from the head of planning enforcement. He arrived with his clipboard telling me that I could not put the fence up. I could not believe what I was witnessing.
I continued to put up the fencing as a security measure.
I then changed the five bar farm gate to a 6ft pallisade gate that would prevent thieves from easily gaining entry over the old farm gate. Again this brought the attention of the enforcement department. and they said: “no”.
I tried to placate the head of enforcement and reason with him, but I could see they were not going to leave me alone, or let me do anything to protect my equipment.
Soon after they said that I could no longer use the field for storage of my builders van, Ifor Williams trailers, or building materials. This heaped immense pressure on me in an already stressful 2007/8 recession.
This was the end of my business as I saw it at the time. I was in a dark place.
At that time I was like most citizens; not having a clue as to how I was being governed. I thought I had an idea of how things worked, but when I came to really examine it, I had no real clue, or any idea where to start to find out. I was starting from scratch. Have you noticed that nobody ever teaches us how we are truly governed?
Well I had to find out, as everything about my life depended on me learning, then knowing how this all worked. I could not rely upon opinions; I had to know the Truth, come what may.
I studied the councils policies on enforcement, I read their constitution document, I read legislation, I looked in to what the highest members of state declare in their public engagements, I was like a sponge for information as I had to find out. I had to keep the council off my back. It took a few years; but I succeeded.
Understanding some of these key aspects on how we are governed is crucial if we are to avoid coming under Crown control.
I started to understand these diferences and began to separate myself from the state; from the things of the legal jurisdiction to the left of the table below:
This pyramid diagram shows the hierarchy of law and governance.
As you can see, “people” and “persons” are very different things at law. Citizens are “persons” of the state, created by the state; whereas “people” are a creation of God.
My first job in arguing against the local council was to separate myself from being a citizen of the state, under state control. But how did I give that control away in the first place? How did I become a citizen/person belonging to the state?
From A People To Personage (bondage)
When you register to vote you consent and volunteer to be represented by Members of Parliament (MP’s).
In the UNITED KINGDOM there is an Act of Parliament called the: Representation of the People Act 1867 whereby it states that a “Man” is entitled to be registered as a voter. However in doing so, that “Man” then becomes a person and citizen of the UNITED KINGDOM, and is then seen as an agent, and employee of the Crown as per the various legal definitions of: person that I have previously provided. That person is then given a new rank and title in its new society.
UNITED KINGDOM, is the title of a corporate polity that operates out of Britain. Britain is the landmass, and UNITED KINGDOM is the title of the corporate body (a legal fiction).
Your act of registering to vote, and voting, makes you a person, a citizen, and an employee of the corporate body titled: UNITED KINGDOM. All of the [laws] policies for that corporate body are known as Acts and Statutes, and they now apply to the person that you have now become (the hyperlinked definition of “become” is very telling – befall).
You walked away from the capacity of being one of the people and that jurisdiction, to become one of many persons of a district, of a country, under a new lord, and have acquired a new status, as part of the body of government.
This is precisely why the name of that Act: The Representation of The People Act 1867, states that the action of registering to vote, re – presents people. It is not the re – presentation of persons; but people. It re – presents people as persons. You start off as people and are re – presented as persons. You start out at Britain and that jurisdiction [lawful] as a people, and then enter the legal UK jurisdiction as a person.
The Monarch serves the people, and rules over his or her persons. Two hats for the two different offices and jurisdictions.
Both Political Wings Belong To The Same Corporate Bird
If you registered to vote there is written evidence that you have confused your name [explained in the From Grace To Fraud Chapter], given your signature and signed an application form. Ultimately, this means that you have left the lawful jurisdiction of Britain as a people, and consented and asked to join the legal system of governance as a person. Even if you subsequently fail to vote, or stop voting in any future elections, that consent is still evidenced, until it is rescinded by you. You are now in a new feudal type of relationship, under a new lord, as explained and evidenced more here in Article #1.
If you do partake in governmental elections, and let us say for arguments sake that you vote for the red party, because they are anti war, but the blue party gets in, who are pro war; the blue party will now have your full volunteered consent, and authority via your act of voting, and the stipulations of the Representation of the People Act 1867, to do as they please, including say; starting a new war, even though the party you voted for were against starting a war. The party who want war, now have your consent to go to war in “your name”; and the war will also now be funded by you as an income tax paying citizen of the UK.
Both political wings belong to the same corporate bird (body), and the corporate bird has an Executive branch, and a Crown to control it; the corporate body will ultimately go wherever the head (Crown) wants it to go. That is why government departments are known as a body, and the Crown is the head of the body – thus comprising a whole person of which you as a UK citizen make up a small part of that corporate body – something for the Christians to ponder, especially as you are called to be a part of the body of Christ, not the body of Parliament
The inferior legal system is a mirror image of the righteous lawful one.
The various government bodies do the actions, the doing, the acts; and the Crown(head) does the thinking, the strategising, and planning. That is also why some companies have a “head office”- that is where corporate strategy is thought up; in the head.
The above describes what the act of voting does. Now I will tell you what voting is. This again may be extremely relevant to those persons that might consider themselves “Christians”:
A vote is a vow and a vow is a “pledge to a deity”. A deity is a god. Logically then, the act of voting is a pledge to another god, a different god, and not The LORD God. Have you ever heard of the biblical saying “no man can serve two masters”? – Matthew 6:24, KJV 1611. Those actions go against the commandments and teachings in The Bible:
• Exodus 20:3, KJV 1611 – Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
• Leviticus 27:2, KJV 1611 – When a man shall make a singular vow, the persons shall be for the LORD by thy estimation.
• Matthew 7:21, KJV 1611 – Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
We have already discovered that The Bible, KJV 1611, is The Supreme Law above all else, and the Law to which all governments adheres.
When you vote, you attorn, and to attorn is to transfer allegiance, or homage to another lord (which is why it is against the Commandments). So if you registered to vote and or vote in an election, you attorned, and turned your back on God and pledged allegiance to another god. Why do you think there is an “Attorney General” in governance? An office dedicated to oversee all of the attorners, of which there are many:
Voting also makes you a person, as stated in the 1867 Act, and The Bible has something serious to say about that too:
• Job 32.22 -22, KJV 1611 – Let me not, I pray you, accept any man’s person, neither let me give flattering titles unto man. For I know not to give flattering titles; in so doing my maker would soon take me away.
• Job 13:10, KJV 1611 – He will surely reprove you, if ye do secretly accept persons.
• Romans 2:11, KJV 1611 – For there is no respect of persons with God.
• Proverbs 24:23, KJV 1611 – These things also belong to the wise. It is not good to have respect of persons in Judgment.
• James 2:9, KJV 1611 – But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
• Acts 10:34, KJV 1611 – Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons.
The above message about persons from The Bible can be heard when judge Kavanaugh takes his oath as a Supreme Court judge in the video link below, when he affirms he will be “no respecter of persons”. More evidence of the supremacy of the Word of God and that The Bible contains The Law. So here you have a judge who presides over the legal and lawful jurisdictions swearing on oath to be “no respecter of persons,” which is the very thing that every citizenof a country is: a “person”.
• Supreme Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh
It is clearly not good to be a person by any measure of the law. Yet most of you reading this will be citizens of your relative country, and have therefore elected to become persons of your own free will.
Throughout the state apparatus and rules, the state takes in to account the two jurisdictions, and the people vs. persons. This is why King Charles has two crowns of office; the St. Edward Crown of God, and the Imperial Crown of state. The crown of God reflects his duty towards God’s people, and the Imperial (Roman) crown reflects his role in ruling over his persons of the United Kingdom.
Judges also swear two separate oaths. One oath is under God, and one oath is to serve the king in his office of state in the United Kingdom. There is a maxim of law that states – judges judge for God.
The police have two roles of office also. One role is as policy enforcers for the policies of the UNITED KINGDOM; their corporate jurisdiction. Their other role is what their oath if for; sworn to protect people and property.
The two jurisdictions roll all the way down to your local council. Their constitutions allude to the two roles of state, the people and the persons as evidenced in the two below photographs from a councils constitution.
So because the council could not get their claws in to me after several years, they decide one last time to try to get me under their jurisdiction; they hired a planning expert from Wales.
I asked for a meeting with their expert. I told him that I would be relying upon his evidence. Some of the questions that I asked him were:
In other words; the councils expert agreed with my own position. There was no dispute.
He tried one last time to offer me to make a planning application; I declined the offer.
At this meeting in front of witnesses the councils expert stated that the council will not be seeking to take me to court.
Many years have past since the last meeting with the council and their expert. The expert left his position a month or two after our meeting.
I have heard no more from the council on the matter of planning enforcement, and I have continued with my substantial construction.
To think that all of this started when I erected a wooden fence which nobody could see behind a hedge; and now I have built my family a farm.
I would like this to be a message to other farmers out there, a message of what can be achieved, a message of hope. If the rules of the game are understood, anything is possible.
In the past I have travelled around Britain helping farmers with their court battles against councils. I know a few farmers who have done, and are doing what I have done. It can be done, but I never said it was easy.
The council did not want to take me to court. That is because when you know who and what you are, they have rues to abide by. They can not go around harming the people. Especially when you stand under the most powerful document on the law there is: The Bible.
Winning this battle means writing to the powers that be and explaining the situation. Explaining some of what we have spoken about today. If you explain yourself well enough, then you too might escape the control of the Crown.
Government is only the body; the Crown is the head. The body follows the head, therefore government always goes where the head wants it to go. Both wings are actually controlled by the same bird (the Crown). That is why the head sits above the body on the governments emblem.
A head and a body make a person.
Capillary Wave (def.)
Capillary waves are the first ripples.
A ripple effect occurs when an initial disturbance to a system propagates outward to disturb an increasingly larger portion of the system.
A situation in which one event produces effects which spread and produce further effects.
A series of things that happen as the result of a particular action or event.