The Capillary Wave
Can Man Live Free Of State Control? -
Clive M Edwards - Bournemouth - January 2026
Understand Law and Governance at: capillarywave.com
Contents:
- Introduction
- Is It Possible To Live A Life Free Of Government Control?
- Alternative “Private” Communities – The Amish
- How Are People on Earth Controlled?
- Are You Free – What Camp Are You In?
- Are The Christian Amish Free?
- You Can’t Solve A Problem With The Same Level Of Consciousness That Created It
- A Question Of Logic
- So You Wanna Be Free? – Prove It
- What’s Your Name And Where Do You Live?
- Agree With Thine Adversary
- Establish The Facts
- Who Owns The Land? A Conundrum Explained
- Civil or Criminal?
- Questions Answered
Introduction
Housekeeping
Outline for today: Talk for 1.5 hours then we can stop for a break and refreshments
Resume the talk for another 1.5 hours
I have to be away for 2pm sharp, so I can not stay behind unfortunately like I usually do
Hullo all and thank you for coming. It was lovely to be invited by Warren to talk here today
How many here have read or seen a few of my talks before?
How many are hearing what I talk about for the first time?
So I was invited here to talk about law and governance with a view to those here in the audience of getting back to the land. A lot of you would like a small field and to live on it; far from the madding crowd, so to speak
Is It Possible To Live A Life Free Of Government Control?
Questions:
So, some questions that we will explore today are:
1. Is it possible for mankind to live a life free of government control?
2. Are there communities in the West that live free from government control?
Let’s take a look at a christian community that have gone out of their way to remove themselves from the wider society…
Alternative “Private” Communities – The Amish
Who Are The Amish?
The Amish are traditionalist Anabaptist Christian communities known for their simple living, plain dress, and rejection of modern technology, preferring horse-and-buggy transport and home-based worship to maintain separation from the secular world and focus on faith, family, and community. Originating from Swiss/Alsatian roots and migrating to America for religious freedom, they follow rules called the Ordnung, emphasizing humility (Demut) and submission (Gelassenheit) over individualism, with rules varying by community but generally limiting education past eighth grade and avoiding worldly influences like TV or public electricity.
- Faith & Community: Strong focus on God, family, and mutual support, with community at the heart of their faith.
- Ordnung: An unwritten code guiding daily life, dress, and technology use, emphasizing order and humility.
- Gelassenheit: A principle of submission to God’s will and community norms, valuing humility and avoiding self-promotion.
- Separation from the World: Deliberately avoiding modern conveniences like cars, TV, and often public electricity to prevent worldliness.
- Plain Living: Simple, practical clothing, homemade goods, and rejection of vanity.
- Technology: Cautious adoption; some use phones but often not cell phones or internet; electricity use varies but public utility power is often avoided.
- Education: Typically ends at 8th grade in their own schools, focusing on core subjects and German language.
- Language: Speak Pennsylvania German (Dutch) at home and in services, alongside English.
- Transportation: Use horse-and-buggy as a hallmark of their separation.
- Roots: Descended from Anabaptist groups, splitting from Mennonites in the late 17th century, led by Jakob Ammann.
- Migration: Came to America (especially Pennsylvania) starting in the 1730s to escape persecution.
- Diversity: Divided into many subgroups (Old Order, New Order, Beachy Amish) with differing rules on technology and interaction.
Questions:
3. Would it be fair to say that the Amish are far more removed from society, and therefore government than all of you?
4. Would it be fair to say that the Amish are about as detached from government and society, as you can be in the the West?
5. So then, are the Amish free of state control?
Before we begin to look at the answers to these five questions posed, let us have a look at the system of law and governance on Earth…
How Are People On Earth Controlled?
Two Camps – Man or God?
- Matthew 6:24, KJV 1611 – No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
- Acts 5:29, KJV 1611 – Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
Two Camps – One Constitution
MENDIP DISTRICT COUNCIL’s Constitution
MENDIP DISTRICT COUNCIL’s CONSTITUTION STATES:
- c) to find ways of effectively and regularly communicating with the electorate and the people of Mendip
- d) to explore ways of being accountable to the electorate and the people of Mendip
Under the heading:
Main Responsibilities and Duties of a Councillor to Mendip District Council:
it states at point d)
to represent the community and bring the views of the electorate and the people of Mendip into the Council’s decision-making process. Balancing individual interests identified within the ward and the ward as a whole
Careful reading of this document clearly shows the two jurisdictions available to you
I will now read out a section from GRAVESEND BOROUGH COUNCIL constitution which will be evidenced on the webpage associated with this talk:
BRAINTREE DISTRICT COUNCIL’s Constitution
Page 180-181 of BRAINTREE’s constitution
GRAVESHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL’s Constitution
At 5.1 – 2) it states:
Allow local people to have a real and informed say about issues that affect them;
at point 3) it states:
explain to the electors and Council Taxpayers the reasons for particular policies and priorities; and in general to improve local accountability
The Two Camps Side by Side – Man vs. God
Graven Image (UK) vs. Reality (Britain)
What Is The Country United Kingdom?
Come Out Of Her My People – Revelation 18:4, KJV 1611
Logic and the Law…
At law the country: UNITED KINGDOM is what is known as a body politic:
A body politic is a political construct; “legal fiction”. This is why it is represented at Wikipedia by a flag, a drawing of some heraldry, and an anthem.
I told you that a legal fiction needs to be represented by other things, because it does not exist; it is not real.
There is nothing to show you for the UNITED KINGDOM, so it shows you other things, which conjure an image in your mind as to what the UNITED KINGDOM is. Which links nicely to the definition of “fiction”, which is; “invented in the mind“.
So a fiction is “invented in the mind”; as is a “graven image“.
Because the UNITED KINGDOM is a body politic, your own local council which exists at law in the UNITED KINGDOM, will also have to be a body politic; and it is, as evidenced at Section 2. (3) of the Local Government Act 1972
Source:
This is also why your local police station is a company and is listed on a business search directory at Dunn & Bradstreet, because they too are a fiction of the law, a company:
And this is why every person that appears at court for summary and indictable offences in the UNITED KINGDOM, are also seen as a “body corporate” as stated at Section 2. of the Interpretation Act 1889
- Word Index: Appear
Law and governance has to be logical.
It has to be: A+B = C, and to me that all makes logical sense.
Because if the country UNITED KINGDOM is a LEGAL FICTION, then it makes sense to me logically, that everything in it, and associated with it, would also have to be LEGAL FICTIONS too – and it is, as the evidence proves
If you think about it, nothing that is real can exist in a fiction; that just does not work, that is not logical.
The legal system works on fictions. The UK is the big fiction, and the police, councils, NHS, and other government bodies, are the smaller legal fictions, that work within the larger UK legal fiction.
A country is a legal, political construct existing only in the mind of the citizen. It does not exist in reality
The legal system is made up of fictions, made up of lies. Which is why it is “secular”. Secular means “the exclusion of belief in God from matters of ethics and morality””.
That definition makes sense when we understand that man’s legal system is based on lies
A “people” can NOT live in a legal fiction of the UNITED KINGDOM. That does not make logical sense. But a people do exist on Britain
Britain is the land mass; the reality, which God created, and the UNITED KINGDOM is a title of a legal fiction, which was created by the Crown.
UNITED KINGDOM is only a title, which is why the Crown only has jurisdiction over titles. You have a title for everything that you “own”
People created by God exist on God’s Earth, and legal fictions created by the state do not exist in reality, but only in our minds, as a creation of the law. As the legal maxim stated earlier; without the law there are no fictions, and the definition of fiction states: “invented in the mind“
This is a battle for your mind
At law a Citizen is a legal fiction, and “lives” in the UNITED KINGDOM. That is why when you are summoned to a court for any, and all summary and indictable offences, they say that you are a body corporate
People can not live in a fiction of a country. That is impossible. That does not make sense. People exist on Britain which is an Island
This is why you can no longer go on holiday to YUGOSLAVIA, because YUGOSLAVIA no longer exists at law, nor in the minds of many people
Understanding the difference between a country and the land mass was crucial information for me in my fight back against the council, and it also enabled me to help many farmers and smallholders at court, against their councils
Word Index: State
What Is Britain?
Britain is the name of the land mass of an Island. The land at Britain is what God created – not the Crown.
The Crown created the title of UNITED KINGDOM (because that is all it is – a title) and God created the Island named Britain.
People exist on Britain, and the electorate, the UK residents, which are legal fictions at law, created by the state “live” in the UNITED KINGDOM
People and citizens; the electorate, could not be further apart in terms of law and governance.
The electorate are the lowest position in society, and the people under God, are the highest position that you can be at law; as I will go on to explain
Learn more about what “Britain” means, and the people of Britain themselves; here:
- Word Index: Britain
Legal Secular Mimimcs The Lawful
The legal system copies and mimics the perfect lawful system.
The legal system of the UNITED KINGDOM and commonwealth is run under Civil Law. Civil law is Roman law
Civil Law by definition means: “secularly organised”
Secular means, and I quote:
“Belonging to the state” – “exclusion of belief in God from matters of ethics and morality”
If you are a state citizen, then by definition, you belong to the state
We know the government are immoral and lack ethics, and we can see this with our own eyes in the world today,
Government is immoral by definition, and stands in direct opposition to Christ. Contrary. Anti.
- Word Index: Secular
Man’s secular legal system is in opposition to Christ, it is the other paradigm, and now the two systems are side by side you can see why. It is lacking of a belief in God, it is immoral because it has replaced Christ at the helm; with man
See my related article: Dear Christian Countrymen
A country is contrary to the lawful jurisdiction of God, it is secular and is a graven image, a legal fiction, existing only in your minds; and that is why The Bible states this at Ezekiel 20:32, KJV 1611
- And that which cometh into your mind shall not be at all, that ye say, We will be as the heathen, as the families of the countries, to serve wood and stone
Are You Free – What Camp Are You In?
Approbate – Reprobate Doctrine
The doctrine of approbate and reprobate traces its roots to Scottish law. It stems from the principles of equity and estoppel, and may be understood as a species of estoppel.
In common parlance, estoppel means that one cannot recant one’s word and deny something accepted earlier.
The doctrine of approbate and reprobate applies in a situation when a person has to choose between two rights, stands or positions. After asserting or acknowledging one right, stand or position, the person in question cannot later choose the other one to gain benefit from both. This doctrine originates from the Latin maxim “quod approbo non reprobo”, which translates to “that which I approve, I cannot disapprove”. Therefore, in totality, it means that one can either accept something completely or deny it. If a person makes contradictory statements, it is often practised and said that he/she must not be heard.
This rule especially applies when a party takes two contradictory stands in the same case or proceeding. It is also closely related to the doctrine of election to the effect that when, on the same facts, a person has the right to claim one of two reliefs and with full knowledge elects one and obtains it, they are not able to then go back on that election and claim the alternative relief to obtain its benefit as well. This doctrine has been used time and again by the courts in India, even in trade mark litigation, especially while analysing and assessing a party’s stand regarding similarity and conflict between competing trade marks or pertaining to the mark’s distinctiveness or generic nature.
Electoral Roll
Registering to vote then having the legal name on the electoral roll, is the evidence that you gave your consent to be governed
- Word Index: Legal Name
The Black Belt Barrister states this in one of his videos that I have pinned on the Notice Board at my website, whereby he states:
“Now many you might be aware of the term policing by consent, and that is consent, not just of the general public by way of election, but also with the consent of the public, the police has a common law duty to uphold the law, and statutory powers with which to do so”
This is what The Bible states about voting:
Leviticus 27:2, KJV 1611 – Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When a man shall make a singular vow, the persons shall be for the LORD by thy estimation.
By placing the legal name on the electoral register, you become eligible for jury service and war conscription. You can also then vote and legally sign a petition.
Having the legal name on the electoral register makes you a UK resident, and subject of the king
I go in to great detail about this process in this interview with Richard Vobes:
In summary, registering the legal name on to the electoral register, is evidence of the fact that you believe yourself to be a UK resident, and citizen, which in turn makes you a subject of the king, thus breaking the first commandment and placing yourself in to the legal secular realm/jurisdiction
The State Issued Legal Name -Date of Birth
See:
- Word Index: Legal Name
Are The Christian Amish Free?
Amish Covid Vaccine Affidavit
Although the Amish may be very private individuals, they:
- Use a state issued legal name
- Are Citizens and Residents of CANADA
- Claim a “civic address”
- Have “religious beliefs” – see my article: Dear Christian Countrymen for a deeper expansion on “religion”
- Claim legal exemption under the “Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms“
Interestingly at the foot of the affidavit Levi Stutzman states:
“We do not get vaccinated, we do not believe in government handouts, nor do we consent to government social mandates. We are a plain people. We do not have cars, telephones, computers.
We support our own private one room schools. We do pay property and education taxes. We do not vote during any public elections (but we pray for those running for office). We do not serve jury duty. We do not have property insurance. We do not engage in lawsuits. We are conscientious objectors of the military. We are in the world, but not of the world. God created us and we depend on Him”
Everything Levi Stutzman stated on his affidavit was a legal defence – apart from being created by God, however everything he evidenced to identify himself was from creations of the state; CERTIFIED COPY OF AN ENTRY
Nowhere on his affidavit do I see any defence from the lawful jurisdiction, from Gods book of the law, from The Bible. Such as:
I am Levi a creation of God
I am not a resident or citizen of the body politic titled: CANADA my creator forbids it:
- Exodus 20:3, KJV 1611 – Thou shalt have no other gods before me
- And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.” – Romans 12:2, KJV 1611
- Matthew 6:24, KJV 1611 – No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
Instead Levi uses CANADIAN legislation to stand under; not The Bible
Amish Farms Liened
What is a “lien”?
- Security: A lien makes a specific asset (like a house, car, or inventory) collateral for a loan or debt.
- Default: If the borrower doesn’t pay, the lienholder can legally enforce the lien, often forcing the sale of the property to recover the money.
- Examples: Common examples include:
- Mortgage Lien: A bank’s claim on your house until the mortgage is paid off. Mechanic’s Lien: A claim by a contractor for unpaid work on a property. Tax Lien: The government’s claim for unpaid taxes.
- Voluntary vs. Involuntary: Liens can be agreed upon (like a mortgage) or imposed by law (like a tax lien).
- Possessory vs. Non-possessory: Some liens involve the creditor holding the property (possessory), while others are just a legal claim against it (non-possessory), like a mortgage.
- Legal Right: It’s a powerful legal tool that ensures creditors have a way to get their money back, affecting the property’s sale or transfer until the lien is cleared.
The Canadian government has placed liens on many Amish farms because they did not comply with Covid-19 legislation when crossing the US / CANADIAN border
Here is a news report on the matter:
- Amish Farm Liens – Youtube Short
- Amish Farm Liens – Longer Youtube Report
You Can’t Solve A Problem With The Same Level Of Consciousness That Created It
Why Relying Upon Legislation As A Defence Can Not Work
How can someone who claims to be under God, with a fleshy heart full of consciousness, be under, and or ruled by; secular Roman Law?
Secular things of the state are by definition worldy affairs, in opposition to the cause of Christ; as I explain in much more detail in my article:
God Calling His People From Out Of The Countries:
- Ezekiel 36:24 – 28, KJV 1611 -For I will take you from among the heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and will bring you into your own land.
25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you.
26 A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.
27 And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them.
28 And ye shall dwell in the land that I gave to your fathers; and ye shall be my people, and I will be your God.
- And that which cometh into your mind shall not be at all, that ye say, We will be as the heathen, as the families of the countries, to serve wood and stone – Ezekiel 20:32, KJV 1611
District: an offenders jurisdiction, in which your new lord can take and withhold personal property for legal reasons
Ward: an infant in the wrong family, under there wrong ruler and guardian
A Question Of Logic
A Stark Matter Of Fact From The Evidence Of The two systems of law and governance displayed on the stage here and online is this:
- You can NOT find freedom, by using a political method, of the body politic: UNITED KINGDOM
- You can NOT gain freedom, by using the legal system and legislation
As Einstein said – You can not solve a problem with the same level of consciousness that created it,
In other words you can not solve a POLITICAL, LEGAL problem, using the POLITICAL LEGAL system
Or, put yet another way; you can not solve a secular problem built on lies, with yet more lies
So You Wanna Be Free? – Prove It
The CERTIFIED COPY OF AN ENTRY states on the document:
- WARNING: A CERTIFICATE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF IDENTITY
The CERTIFIED COPY OF AN ENTRY evidences that the legal name stated on it, is NOT your name, and can NOT be used to identify you
In other words; to claim that the legal name displayed on that document is your name could be seen as fraud
The CERTIFIED COPY OF AN ENTRY does not prove what your name is, therefore neither does a driving licence or passport which were all gained from this foundational document
You CAN NOT prove your own name, the good news is, neither can your adversary
To understand more about the legal name have a look at the capillary wave word index here:
- Word Index: Legal Name
You can read up on “name law” and make a public declaration of your name here at:
What’s Your Name And Where Do You Live?
Two of the most basic questions you will ever be asked from persons in authority, and we all usually get the answers wrong
We usually give a legal name, and state that we live in a body politic – UNITED KINGDOM; a legal jurisdiction just as Levi Stutzman did in his affidavit, thus giving away jurisdiction and ensuring that you will be under states legislation and treated as a “commoner” a third class citizen, a member of the House of Commons
Agree With Thine Adversary
- Matthew 5:25, KJV 1611 – Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
Establish the facts early, and get your adversary to agree with you; they can NOT prove otherwise
Establish The Facts
The state only has jurisdiction over state created things, the things that only exist in the mind, such as a body politic, a legal name, and titles
Whenever you are dealing with agents of the state, everything that they will ask of you, will steer you in to answering to their legal name, using a legal postal address, of the body politic (country)
The Two Camps Side by Side – Man vs. God
I have stated that the most basic question that everyone gets wrong is what’s your name and where do you live?
That is because the answers to those questions quickly give away jurisdiction, and establish you as a state citizen
What your name is and where you live is of the utmost importance. Do you exist on Britain with a Christian name? ie in the lawful jurisdiction under The LORD God?
Or do you live in the UNITED KINGDOM with a legal name at a postal address?
The Bible states this about who owns the land:
- The land shall not be sold for ever: for the land is mine… – Leviticus 25:23, KJV 1611
Yet the Crown states this about who owns the land in their Land Registration Act 2002:
- “The Crown is the only absolute owner of land in England and Wales”
Who Owns The Land? – A Conundrum Explained
The Crown, via their Confession of Faith Ratification Act 1560 states that that The Bible is the “infallible truth”
Infallible means: “exempt from error in judgement, knowledge, or opinion”
Given that the Crown agrees that The Bible is infallible, and The Bible states that God owns all the land, the Crown via their Land Registration Act 2002 can only be talking about their own “legal land”; their own “legal titles”, their legal fictional land, in their legal fictional country, their graven image copy of God’s land, as evidenced in the two jurisdictional banners above – yet more proof and evidence of the two jurisdictions available on Earth – which I explain and discuss at nearly all of my talks.
There is no disputing the two jurisdictions, it is self evident and patently obvious
Civil Or Criminal?
See folder
Questions Answered
1. Is it possible for mankind to live a life free of government control?
2. Are there communities in the West that live free from government control?
3. Would it be fair to say that the Amish are far more removed from society, and therefore government than all of you?
4. Would it be fair to say that the Amish are about as detached from government and society, as you can be in the the West?
5. So then, are the Amish free of state control?
My Youtube Channel:
My Various Links:
Government is only the body; the Crown is the head.
The body follows the head, therefore government always goes where the head wants it to go.
Both political wings are actually controlled by the same bird (the Crown). That is why the head sits above the body on the governments emblem.
A head and a body make a person.
Capillary Wave (def.)
Capillary waves are the first ripples.
A ripple effect occurs when an initial disturbance to a system propagates outward to disturb an increasingly larger portion of the system.
A situation in which one event produces effects which spread and produce further effects.
A series of things that happen as the result of a particular action or event.